I asked this question on the epic thread here: http://forums.pockettactics.com/discussion/764/mobile-gaming-is-growing-up-mobile-gaming-criticism-isnt#latest
, but didn't get an answers.
After launching Stone Age last year we were of course excited to get a Metacritic score, but we are still missing one "critical" review to get a final score. Many reviews are missing from there, most notably PT (and iOS Board Games to a lesser extent). So, I'm wondering if anyone has any context for what MC uses to determine a "critic's" review. Further, do you guys look to MC for a general sense of the quality of a game, or has that become a bit antiquated and not useful from a more hardcore gamer's perspective?